Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 6(1): e94, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1984312

RESUMEN

The Recruitment Innovation Center (RIC) has created a toolkit of novel strategies to engage potential participants in response to recruitment and retention challenges associated with COVID-19 studies. The toolkit contains pragmatic, generalizable resources to help research teams increase awareness of clinical trials and opportunities to participate; produce culturally sensitive and engaging recruitment materials; improve consent and return of results processes; and enhance recruitment of individuals from populations disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. This resource, the "RIC COVID-19 Recruitment and Retention Toolkit," is available free online. We describe the toolkit and the community feedback used to author and curate this resource.

2.
J Clin Transl Sci ; 6(1): e49, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1815388

RESUMEN

Introduction: As clinical trials were rapidly initiated in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) faced unique challenges overseeing trials of therapies never tested in a disease not yet characterized. Traditionally, individual DSMBs do not interact or have the benefit of seeing data from other accruing trials for an aggregated analysis to meaningfully interpret safety signals of similar therapeutics. In response, we developed a compliant DSMB Coordination (DSMBc) framework to allow the DSMB from one study investigating the use of SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma to treat COVID-19 to review data from similar ongoing studies for the purpose of safety monitoring. Methods: The DSMBc process included engagement of DSMB chairs and board members, execution of contractual agreements, secure data acquisition, generation of harmonized reports utilizing statistical graphics, and secure report sharing with DSMB members. Detailed process maps, a secure portal for managing DSMB reports, and templates for data sharing and confidentiality agreements were developed. Results: Four trials participated. Data from one trial were successfully harmonized with that of an ongoing trial. Harmonized reports allowing for visualization and drill down into the data were presented to the ongoing trial's DSMB. While DSMB deliberations are confidential, the Chair confirmed successful review of the harmonized report. Conclusion: It is feasible to coordinate DSMB reviews of multiple independent studies of a similar therapeutic in similar patient cohorts. The materials presented mitigate challenges to DSMBc and will help expand these initiatives so DSMBs may make more informed decisions with all available information.

3.
J Biomed Inform ; 117: 103765, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1157457

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented strain on every aspect of the healthcare system, and clinical research is no exception. Researchers are working against the clock to ramp up research studies addressing every angle of COVID-19 - gaining a better understanding of person-to-person transmission, improving methods for diagnosis, and developing therapies to treat infection and vaccines to prevent it. The impact of the virus on research efforts is not limited to investigators and their teams. Potential participants also face unparalleled opportunities and requests to participate in research, which can result in a significant amount of participant fatigue. The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research recognized early in the pandemic that a solution to assist researchers in the rapid identification of potential participants was critical, and thus developed the COVID-19 Recruitment Data Mart. This solution does not rest solely on technology; the addition of experienced project managers to support researchers and facilitate collaboration was essential. Since the platform and study support tools were launched on July 20, 2020, four studies have been onboarded and a total of 1693 potential participant matches have been shared. Each of these patients had agreed in advance to direct contact for COVID-19 research and had been matched to study-specific inclusion/exclusion criteria. Our innovative Data Mart system is scalable and looks promising as a generalizable solution for simultaneously recommending individuals from a pool of patients against a pool of time-sensitive trial opportunities.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , COVID-19 , Data Warehousing , Humanos , Pandemias
4.
Trials ; 22(1): 221, 2021 Mar 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1143248

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma is being used widely as a treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the clinical efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma is unclear. METHODS: The Passive Immunity Trial for Our Nation (PassITON) is a multicenter, placebo-controlled, blinded, randomized clinical trial being conducted in the USA to provide high-quality evidence on the efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma as a treatment for adults hospitalized with symptomatic disease. Adults hospitalized with COVID-19 with respiratory symptoms for less than 14 days are eligible. Enrolled patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 unit (200-399 mL) of COVID-19 convalescent plasma that has demonstrated neutralizing function using a SARS-CoV-2 chimeric virus neutralization assay. Study treatments are administered in a blinded fashion and patients are followed for 28 days. The primary outcome is clinical status 14 days after study treatment as measured on a 7-category ordinal scale assessing mortality, respiratory support, and return to normal activities of daily living. Key secondary outcomes include mortality and oxygen-free days. The trial is projected to enroll 1000 patients and is designed to detect an odds ratio ≤ 0.73 for the primary outcome. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide the most robust data available to date on the efficacy of COVID-19 convalescent plasma for the treatment of adults hospitalized with acute moderate to severe COVID-19. These data will be useful to guide the treatment of COVID-19 patients in the current pandemic and for informing decisions about whether developing a standardized infrastructure for collecting and disseminating convalescent plasma to prepare for future viral pandemics is indicated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04362176 . Registered on 24 April 2020.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Hospitalización , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/virología , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Sueroterapia para COVID-19
5.
review equipoise COVID19 SARSCoV2 pandemic ethics research ; 2020(Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology): EN,
Artículo en Inglés | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-1017043

RESUMEN

A review. Equipoise in translational research and in clin. practice means there is essential uncertainty in terms of benefit or risk resulting from the use of a particular therapy. The interplay between equipoise and ethics form one of the essential foundations of clin. research;one notable clin. ethicist succinctly characterized equipoise as "a clin. necessary condition in all cases of clin. research.". In the setting of COVID-19, there are no therapies with known effect. We rely on supportive care only. To be clear: 100% of pharmacol. therapies in use today are not established for this disease and no evidence exists that any treatment is more helpful than harmful, a critical premise underlying the ethical practice of medicine. Fundamentally, a firm evidence base on which to decide the appropriate path for the patients in our care is lacking, and the abundance of anecdote -- normally a hypothesis generation mechanism -- can get in the way of our societal need to understand the risks and benefits of untested therapies through well controlled, randomized trials. The challenges facing us in the current pandemic are undeniably urgent, but do not preclude systematic and thorough evaluation of risk and benefit. This call is echoed by others advocating for design and completion of high-quality trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of all therapies under consideration for COVID-19.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA